In my last to posts I have been rambling about certifications, but it is time to put something useful on this page.
When PernixData released 2.x of FVP they really got the attention of the vCommunity. Lots of posts and happy people all around about two years ago.
For those of you who are not familiar with the topic:
The idea of FVP and similar products is to take the I/O handling as close to the source as possible, which is in case of VMs the ESXi host. You can use memory or flash storage devices as a read or (mirrored-)write cache for your most demanding VMs. (Cached) Requests are instantly answered and load is taken from your storage system. This is especially useful if you have an older model with very little or no flash and/or experience performance problems and you 6want to protect your investment (read: no chance to upgrade hardware any time soon). There are of course other use cases but I’ll try to keep this simple.
But after Nutanix acquired PernixData they essentially buried FVP as a product.
However Nutanix fulfills the support for customers with an existing contract but by now you should have a “plan B” if you need I/O acceleration at host level.
FVP lacks vSphere 6.5 support and I find it hard to believe that great efforts are being made to deliver it anytime soon. (Side note: More than FVP I’ll be missing the PernixData Architect which delivers quite a good view into the storage layer and is very easy to handle.) *UPDATE: I am very sorry, I didn’t give the folks at Pernix/Nutanix the credit they deserve, update is targeted for 04/17 according to support.
So, let’s have a look at a possible alternative:
APA uses vSphere APIs for I/O Filtering (VAIO) for their implementation, which is quite nice in my opinion since this is standardized within the vSphere environment. Here I take the liberty to quote directly from VMware:
VAIO is a Framework that enables their parties (Partners) to develop filters that run in ESXi and can intercept any IO requests from a guest operating system to a virtual disk. An IO will not be issued or committed to disk without being processed by IO Filters created by 3rd parties (source)
Right now there are two supported use cases (caching and replication) and according to VMware
caching will significantly increase the IOPS available, reduce latency, and increase hardware utilization rates (quote from the source from above)
If someone is interested in an overview of currently supported VAIO solutions, you may find it here.
What does APA offer?
According to their technical brief they do not cache randomly or only the most frequented blocks but do this acutally application aware (hence the name, I guess):
Only the most important application components such as frequently accessed tables or indexes that speed up queries are optimized, while less critical elements such as log records, replicas, audit entries, or ad hoc user activity are de-prioritized.
I’m not sure how to track this in the future and verify the claim, so comments are welcome and if I find a way I’ll let you know 🙂
Like FVP they APA offers the possibility to mirror the write cache across hosts which is a must if you take this into production. I’ll need to check if they support fault domains (i.e. two data center).
For a more details on how it works have a look at the VMware blogs where Murali Nagaraj, CTO of PrimaryIO posted about this.
Thank you for your attention, in part 2 I will continue on with the APA appliance deployment
Note: My posts on this topic are in no way sponsored by PrimaryIO.
Personal blog, remember? 🙂